In previous posts, we have discussed achieving FISMA compliance from the perspective of federal agencies and cloud service providers (CSPs). However, federal contractors are also required to meet stringent compliance requirements to handle sensitive government data securely. Compliance frameworks like the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) play a critical role in ensuring that contractors align with FISMA requirements and remain eligible for federal contracts.

In preview post, we have discussed achieving compliance from the perspective of a government agency. However, Cloud Service Provider (CSP) like Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and Google GCP are also mandated to satisfy FISMA compliance to enable them offer services to the U.S. government. Achieving a Provisional Authorization to Operate (P-ATO) guidelines is a methodlogy that signals to government agencies that a CSPs cloud services are secure, reliable, and ready to be consumed by the government.

In previous posts, FISMA Compliance For Intelligence Agencies, we explored how intelligence agencies can achieve Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) compliance using the ICD 503. In this post, we will dive into how defense agencies approach FISMA compliance. Specifically, we will focus on how these agencies align their risk management practices with the DOD Instruction 8510.01 - RMF For DoD Systems. Understanding the DoD 8510.01 RMF The general RMF process, as defined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), is a structured approach to identifying, assessing, and managing risks to information systems.

In previous posts, FISMA Compliance For Federal Civilian Agencies, we explored how federal civilian agencies can achieve Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) compliance using the Risk Management Framework (RMF) and NIST 800-53 controls. In this post, we will dive into how intelligence agencies—such as the CIA, NSA, and others in the Intelligence Community (IC)—approach FISMA compliance. Specifically, we will focus on how these agencies align their risk management practices with the Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 503.

In the previous post Overview of the US Government Cybersecurity Regulatory Landscape, we explored the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA), introduced the Risk Management Framework (RMF), and discussed how different government sectors apply the RMF to meet FISMA’s requirements. Now, we’ll shift focus to the practical steps that federal civilian agencies must take to achieve FISMA compliance, ensuring their information systems remain secure in an increasingly hostile digital environment.